22 November 2008 E-MAIL SEARCH
Home Page
Newsroom
From the Top
Business Buzz
Marketing Mix
Financial Focus
Management Matters
PR Points
Web Wisdom
Industry Reports
Business Glossary
Resources
U.S. Gov. Resources
Print this page Bookmark this page
  
Marketing Mix> Adopting to DRGs, Part 3: A Medical Device Company's Perspective
 

This series from Amir Inbar of Mediclever has examined DRG codes and discussed the way in which their payment levels are set. In this final article of the series, Amir shows the implications of DRGs on the way a medical device company should approach its reimbursement project.


Read the full version of the article in Hebrew.

Read part 1 and part 2 of this series.

Since a DRG code covers a hospital's full cost of administrating treatment for a certain disease group, including the cost associated with the utilized medical device, a new medical device should lead to one of the following outcomes:


1. A reduction in the hospital's cost of providing treatment within the framework of the relevant DRG. Thus, the hospital will continue to receive the same amount of reimbursement due to the DRG, but lower its expenses and therefore increase its profit.

2. The new medical device does not reduce the hospital's cost of providing treatment within the framework of the relevant DRG, but it does lower the overall costs of the healthcare system.

A Closer Look: Reducing the Hospital's Cost
In the case of option #1 above, a careful analysis of the hospital's current DRG-related cost drivers should be performed and compared with the costs of providing the same service when the new device is utilized.

This analysis should consider the following:

--payment for the medical team's work
--cost of utilized medical devices
--medication and anesthetics
--use of hospital facilities (e.g., OR)
--cost of hospitalization

If the new medical device fits into an existing DRG and the hospital's overall costs associated with this DRG decrease, there is a good chance of making the sale.

No further reimbursement effort is required.

A Closer Look: Lowering the Overall Cost
In the case of option #2 above, the company will have to seek approval from entities that look at the bigger healthcare picture or are concerned about the budget of the overall healthcare system. Such entities include insurance companies, sickness funds, or the government.

The medical device company will then need to convince such an entity that an increase in the reimbursement level of a certain DRG would eventually lead to an overall reduction in healthcare costs due to fewer complications, fewer repeat procedures, and other advantages.

This process is indeed long and expensive. It should not be undertaken unless it is impossible to implement option #1. However, even if option #2 is required, there are still a few intermediate reimbursement mechanisms that could be utilized, until a formal new reimbursement mechanism has been established.

Recommended Reading
These intermediate mechanisms are described in "Alternative Reimbursement Mechanisms in Germany" and "A Rapid Path to US Reimbursement" (Hebrew). Both are in PDF format.

About Mediclever
Mediclever manages end-to-end reimbursement projects for Israeli companies selling medical technology products in the United States and Europe.

Mediclever identifies the availability of existing reimbursement codes (relevant to the product), and in case such existing mechanisms do not exist, Mediclever outlines processes and criteria for obtaining coverage, including the development of new or modified codes and the establishment of favorable coverage guidelines for such codes.

Mediclever appoints an outsourced reimbursement project manager for each Israeli client. The manager works at the client's site and leads the leading the reimbursement project, which saves the company from hiring and training a full-time reimbursement manager.


©2002–2008 Trendlines International Ltd. All rights reserved.
Phone: +972.4.958.3323 | postmaster@trendlines.com
Directions | Privacy Policy | Site Map
This site contains material copyrighted by third parties.
This site is best viewed in Internet Explorer version 5 or higher.